Blogs

Fossils of New Vulture Species Found in Cuba

Thursday, January 14, 2021

Hypothetical reconstruction of the Emslie’s vulture (Cathartes emsliei). Image credit: William Suárez.

A new species of small vulture that lived during the Quaternary period in the Greater Antilles has been identified from fossils found in western Cuba.

“Two species of New World vultures (family Cathartidae) form part of the modern avifauna of Cuba: the common turkey vulture (Cathartes aura) and the black vulture (Coragyps atratus), which is very rare,” Cuban ornithologist William Suarez and Dr. Storrs Olson from the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of Natural History wrote in their paper.

“Vultures were better represented in Cuba’s fossil record during the Late Pleistocene and part of the Holocene and included the Cuban condor (Gymnogyps varonai).”

The newly-discovered species belongs to Cathartes, a genus of medium-sized to large carrion-feeding birds in the Cathartidae family.

Named the Emslie’s vulture (Cathartes emsliei), it lived during the Late Pleistocene to Holocene epoch, until as recently as 5,000 years ago.

“The species is named for our esteemed colleague and friend, Dr. Steven D. Emsli from the University of North Carolina Wilmington, in recognition of his contribution to the knowledge of New World vultures, including those from Cuba,” the researchers explained.

Right scapulas (A-B, ventral view) and left coracoids (C-D, dorsal view) of the lesser yellow-headed vulture (A, C) and the Emslie’s vulture (B, D). Scale bar – 1 cm. Image credit: William Suárez.

The fossilized bones of the Emslie’s vulture were recovered from Quaternary asphalt deposits at the site of Las Breas de San Felipe and cave deposits in Cueva de Sandoval and Cueva del Indio in western Cuba.

Some specimens of the ancient bird are the smallest known in the genus Cathartes.

“Cuban scavengers were highly specialised, evolving in the complete absence of carnivorous mammals, and becoming extinct during the Holocene,” the scientists wrote.

“The Emslie’s vulture appears to be derived from a Central American ancestor — probably one related to the smaller living species, the lesser yellow-headed vulture (Cathartes burrovianus) — rather than from North America, unlike the two other extinct Cuban taxa in the genera Coragyps and Gymnogyps.”

“Skulls with massive and large bills, compared to continental congeners, are common adaptations in Cuban carrion-eaters.”

The discovery of the Emslie’s vulture is reported in a paper in the Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club.

_____

William Suárez & Storrs L. Olson. 2020. A new fossil vulture (Cathartidae: Cathartes) from Quaternary asphalt and cave deposits in Cuba. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club 140 (3): 335-343; doi: 10.25226/bboc.v140i3.2020.a6

Source:

Paleontologists Find Evolutionary Link between Ediacaran and Early Cambrian Multicellular Animals

Wednesday, January 13, 2021

Namacalathus (individuals numbered). Centimeter scale. Image credit: Shore et al., doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf2933.

Paleontologists have described the first three-dimensional preservation of soft tissue in Namacalathus hermanastes, a skeletal metazoan (multicellular animal) that lived some 547 million years ago (Ediacaran period) in what is now Namibia, and established a strong evolutionary link between Ediacaran and early Cambrian metazoans.

Until recently, little was known about the origins of animals that evolved during the Cambrian explosion event because of a lack of well-preserved fossil evidence.

The mysterious origins of animals that evolved at this time baffled 19th century naturalist Charles Darwin. It is often referred to as Darwin’s dilemma.

Prior to the new study, it had proven difficult to trace links with earlier animals because their soft tissues — which provide vital clues about the animals’ ancestry — almost always break down over time.

During fieldwork in Namibia, University of Edinburgh’s Professor Rachel Wood and colleagues unearthed the well-preserved fossilized remains of Namacalathus hermanastes.

Using an X-ray imaging technique, they found some of the animals’ soft tissues immaculately preserved inside the fossils by a metallic mineral called pyrite.

Until now, paleontologists had only ever identified skeletal remains of Namacalathus hermanastes.

Reconstruction of the living Namacalathus: 1 – stem; 2 – parental cup; 3 – daughter cups; 4 – hollow ciliated tentacles; 5 – spines; 6 – lateral lumen; 7 – central opening; 8 – inner skeletal layer, foliated with columnar microlamellar inflections; 9 – internal (middle) skeletal later, organic rich; 10 – external outer skeletal layer, foliated with columnar skeletal inflections. Image credit: J. Sibbick.

Professor Wood and co-authors then examined the soft tissues of the Ediacaran animal and compared them with those in animals that evolved later.

They found that Namacalathus hermanastes was an early ancestor of species that appeared during the Cambrian explosion. Among them are types of prehistoric worms and mollusks.

“These are exceptional fossils, which give us a glimpse into the biological affinity of some of the oldest animals,” Professor Wood said.

“They help us trace the roots of the Cambrian explosion and the origin of modern animal groups.”

“Such preservation opens up many new avenues of research into the history of life which was previously not possible.”

The study was published in the journal Science Advances.

_____

A.J. Shore et al. 2021. Ediacaran metazoan reveals lophotrochozoan affinity and deepens root of Cambrian Explosion. Science Advances 7 (1): eabf2933; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf2933

Source: www.sci-news.com/

Did Dinosaurs Sleep at Night?

Wednesday, January 13, 2021

Even Tyrannosaurus rexes needed to nap sometimes. A still-growing fossil record is showing how dinosaurs used to doze.

From museum halls to movie screens, we love to see dinosaurs at their fiercest. All those teeth, claws, spikes, horns, and other weird adornments have provided plenty of inspiration for dramatic — and often brutal — Mesozoic scenes through the years. But dinosaur lives were not simply “red in tooth and claw.” These once-real animals had plenty of other concerns in their daily lives — like resting, dozing, and sleeping.

Before getting into how dinosaurs said goodnight, however, it’s worth asking when dinosaurs napped. Animals today tend to be mostly active either during the day, at night, or at dawn and dusk. And in 2011, paleontologists Lars Schmitz and Ryosuke Motani suggested that various non-avian dinosaurs were active at different times of the day, too.

Schmitz and Motani investigated delicate eye bones of various dinosaurs to see how those structures, called scleral rings, related to when the reptiles might have been active. The bones not only outline how large the eyes were, but how much light they let in. Following this logic, then, the researchers found that large, plant-eating dinosaurs like the duckbilled Corythosaurus were likely stomping around during morning and evening, while predators such as the infamous Velociraptor stalked the night.

But dinosaurs eventually wound down from their daily business, no matter whether they were active at night or during the day. A growing collection of fossils is revealing how they did so.

The fossil of a small, raptor-like dinosaur named Mei Long, whose name translates to "sleeping dragon." (Credit: Bruce McAdam/CC by 2.0/Wikimedia Commons)

How Dinosaurs Say Goodnight

When a drowsy raptor, for example, set about going to sleep, the dinosaur probably took a familiar pose. Rare skeletons and trace fossils — or impressions made by once-alive dinosaurs — indicate that at least some dinosaurs shuffled their feet beneath them, folded their arms, and rested their heads on their backs just like some slumbering birds today. Almost a century ago, paleontologist Charles Lewis Camp described the bones of a small, meat-eating dinosaur called Segisaurus found with its arms and legs tucked beneath it.

Multiple other finds have popped up since then. In the Jurassic rock of southern Utah there’s a body impression of a largeDilophosaurus-like dinosaur that sat down to rest, shuffled forward, and settled in. From the way the dinosaur sat to how it held its hands, this carnivore acted in a very bird-like way despite living over 40 million years before the first birds evolved. Better yet, paleontologists have also described the fossil of a small, raptor-like dinosaur named Mei long that was asleep — curled up and snugly — as ash buried the unfortunate animal. Its name translates to "sleeping dragon."

Here, the dinosaur Dilophosaurus wetherilli lounges in a bird-like pose. (Credit: Heather Kyoht Luterman)

To date, most resting dinosaur finds have been of strange, parrot-like dinosaurs called oviraptorosaurs. “We have way more resting oviraptorids than any other group of dinosaurs,” says University of Edinburgh paleontologist Greg Funston, noting that there are more than half a dozen published specimens. Just last year, Funston and colleagues published another example — youngsters of a new oviraptorosaur named Oksoko that were found in the classic resting pose.

So far, most of the finds are associated with one particular branch of the dinosaur family tree — the theropods, to which birds also belong. A rare counterexample is a plant-eating dinosaur named Changmiania that was named in 2020 from a pair of skeletons found in curled-up resting poses, representing dinosaurs that had been buried in a den collapse. But when it comes to favorite giants like TriceratopsStegosaurusApatosaurus and others, those dinosaurs may have been too big to leave clues. “There is probably a limit to how big an animal can get before it can’t get buried alive,” Funston says. So it’s unlikely that paleontologists are going to find a Brachiosaurus that perished while dozing off.

The local environment has a role to play, too. “In areas like the Gobi desert of Mongolia, which is an oviraptorid hot spot, some of the rocks are from desert environments where animals are more easily buried alive,” Funston says. Great sand dunes near where the dinosaurs nested could suddenly collapse and bury them at rest, a special circumstance not found in many other places.

Trace fossils could be helpful here. Dinosaurs left their tracks and impressions as well as bones. The trick would be recognizing them. “If some dinosaurs did lie down in fully horizontal positions, the traces of those behaviors might be so big and messy that we would have a tough time recognizing them as trace fossils,” Emory University paleontologist Anthony Martin says. Thinking on dinosaur scale isn’t always easy.

Nevertheless, paleontologists are still picking away at the quieter side of dinosaur lives. Just this month, paleontologists proposed that they’d found traces made by a resting Tyrannosaurus that pushed itself up off the ground with its forearms. Martin is skeptical of the identification, noting that the traces may be unrelated impressions, but he still is glad other researchers are thinking of dinosaurs doing things other than biting each other. “Dinosaurs weren’t always in constant motion, chasing or being chased,” says Martin. “Sometimes they needed to stop, look, and listen. Or just chill.”

Source: www.discovermagazine.com/

Over 240 Dinosaur Footprints Discovered in East China

Wednesday, January 13, 2021

A team of Chinese paleontologists has identified more than 240 fossilized dinosaur footprints in southeast China’s Fujian Province, the first traces of dinosaur activity found in the province.

The dinosaur track site in Shanghang County, covering an area of about 1,600 square meters, is the largest and the most diverse such site discovered in China dating back to the Upper Cretaceous period, according to scientists.

The 80-million-year-old tracks in Shanghang County were left by at least eight types of dinosaurs, including sauropods, large and small theropods and ornithopods, scientists said yesterday at a news conference held in the provincial capital Fuzhou.

Fossil dinosaur footprints are discovered in Shanghang County, Longyan City, Fujian Province, China, November 9, 2020. /Xinhua

“Judging from the size of the footprints, which were 8 to 55 centimeters long, lengths of the dinosaurs range from 1 meter to 10 meters,” said Xing Lida, a member of the research team and associate professor at the China University of Geosciences.

The footprints included three-toed imprints left by carnivorous theropods, which stood out with sharp claw marks; sauropod footprints that resemble large round pits; and other three-toed marks “that look like clover leaves” left by hadrosaurs, the researcher said.

The finding is of particular significance given the scarcity of Upper Cretaceous dinosaur footprints in China, he added.

The site also revealed footprints over 30cm that were left by large bird-like Deinonychosauria, the first such finding of the Upper Cretaceous dinosaur nationwide, Xing said.

Source: Xinhua

Jurassic World Is More Book-Accurate Than Jurassic Park In a Key Way

Tuesday, January 12, 2021

Unlike the original Jurassic Park, Jurassic World follows a similar approach as its source novels.

Though it opened to critical acclaim, made millions and spawned two sequels, Jurassic World is still a point of contention for those who prefer the original Jurassic Park trilogy. From the more saturated, less natural art style to how the science of the movie is handled, detractors of the Jurassic World series find plenty to pick at.

However, Jurassic World is more accurate to the source material than the Jurassic Park movies. The two novels written by Michael Crichton lack the warm tones of the Spielberg films and instead happily focus on human hubris and their failings, detailing just how this leads to the park's ruin. And Jurassic World follows this same plot.

The most important parallel of the book and film is how the animals are treated. In the book, the animals are simply park attractions. Little consideration is given to their living conditions, and most safety protocols are added after the fact, such as with the Dilophosaurus. The expected number of dinosaurs are counted, since there was no expectation for their science to fail, and many of the big-name deaths (such as John Hammond's) occurs when the characters underestimate the animals.

Jurassic World does the same thing, starting with referring to the animals as assets, not living things. The businessmen are only concerned with the bottom line, feeling that an artificial hybrid is needed to bolster the park's flagging profits, despite other zoos getting along fine with more natural approaches. The scientists, in the meantime, only view the animals as tools, manipulating DNA and playing to expectations instead of accuracy.

Character personalities are truer to the books as well. In the original trilogy, only a few characters are entirely motivated by selfish interests, and they pay for it in the end. In the second trilogy, the opposite is true. Owen and his friend Barry are more concerned with the animals' well-being, but they are in the minority. Most others are motivated by greed or self-interest.

Even the animals aren't safe from personality flaws. In both the books and the second trilogy, herbivorous dinosaurs are portrayed in the classical dimwitted sense, with the intelligent carnivorous dinosaurs — such as Velociraptors or the genetically-engineered Indominous Rex — portrayed as malignant malcontents who kill for the fun of it. These are genetically engineered theme park monsters: antagonists the protagonists must overcome if they are to get out of the story alive.

The exact opposite is true in the original trilogy: the dinosaurs' basic behavior can be traced back to simple animal behavior. The T. Rex attacking the cars is less aggressive monster behavior and more a curious predator interacting with a new thing. Most of the dinosaurs do not react in an overly aggressive manner until prompted. Even the Velociraptors, specifically in the first film, behave as intelligent species that were kept in a too-small cage with no enrichment, the same as the I. Rex in Jurassic World.

So where does this discrepancy between the first trilogy and the second trilogy come from? Michael Crichton was alive when the first trilogy was made, so it would make sense that it would adhere more to his books. Why then would the second trilogy be truer to his portrayal?

One clear answer is Steven Spielberg's attachment to the first trilogy. Spielberg's films are famous for having that human element; for having characters with clear arcs that the audience can connect to. Spielberg also wanted the most accurate dinosaurs he could portray on film and was diligent to provide the most accurate depiction of dinosaurs the '90s could provide.

The second trilogy is not as preoccupied with this, instead cashing in on nostalgia and bathing in cynicism, much like the books. The modern trilogy's mindset and worldview greatly resemble that of the books, where mercantilism and self-absorption are the watchwords. Gone is the kindly old man unique to the first trilogy, or the characters that progress along clear arcs. Instead, there are those who die to help hammer in the moral and those designated to live. These are no longer living dinosaurs — just monsters to carry out punishment and drive the story. The second trilogy is a heavy-handed commentary on human hubris carried by the spectacle of dinosaurs, making it more accurate to the books than the first trilogy.

Source: www.cbr.com/

Prehistoric "Hell Ant" Encased in Amber Seen Biting its Prey for Over 99 Million Years

Monday, January 11, 2021

(Photo : Vincent Perichot / Wikimedia Commons) Frontal view of a Ceratomyrmex ellenbergeri head. Specimen number SEC-BU39-004; Siegardh Ellenberger private collection, Germany Burmese amber, Earliest Cenomanian; Kachin State, Myanmar

A 99-million-year-old Hell Ant from the Cretaceous period is imprisoned in amber as it uses its scythe-like jaw and unusual headgear to bite its prey.

What are Hell Ants?

Ever since discovering the first 16 species of hell ants, paleontologists have suspected that the unique mandible operated vertically rather than today's ants that shut horizontally.

The recent discovery of Ceratomyrmex ellenbergeri fortifies paleontologists' theories on how the Creteacean-era hell ants thrived. 

According to an article by the Smithsonian, these ants have two distinct features that cannot be found in any living species today. The ant species had specialized scythe-like mandibles and various horns located on their forehead, says a paleontologist from the New Jersey Institute of Technology in an interview with CNN's Katie Hunt.

In a statement, Barden explains, "The only way for prey to be captured in such an arrangement is for the ant mouthparts to move up and downward in a direction unlike that of all living ants and nearly all insects."

He further says, "Fossilized behavior is exceedingly rare, predation especially so. 

A paper published in the journal Current Biology talks about how the hell ants confirm the hell ants' mandible articulation and the integration of its head capsules and mandibles. It also explains how the integration drove morphospace in early ant lineages.

As per The Washington Post, The findings came from a hell ant encrusted in amber as its feasts on a Capatoraptor elegans, an extinct ancestor of cockroaches. The amber was discovered in Myanmar in 2017.

Barden tells Newsweek, "Once the prey was gripped in this way, the ant most probably moved on to an immobilizing sting--we know that the stings of hell ants were well developed."

Upon discovery, Barden and his team theorize that as the cockroach nymph was paralyzed due to the hell ants' sting, it was then fed to hell ant larvae that had unspecialized mouthparts and could chew the unlucky prey normally.

After the larvae have ingested the prey, adults might have made small incisions in the larvae's soft bodies to drink their blood (hemolymph). Simply put, adult hell ants used their offspring as a social digestive system.

Hell ants are known as one of the earliest forms of ants that died out about 65 million years after roaming the planet for 20 million years.

According to Barden, "More than 99% of all species that have ever lived have gone extinct."

Since the first hell ants' discoveries roughly 100 years ago, scientists remain baffled by the distinct features of the Creteacean-era ants compared to their modern-day counterparts.

Scientists and researchers are hopeful that with the discovery of the 99-million-year-old prehistoric hell ant trapped in amber, more knowledge on how forms of the species survived mass extinction events. 

Source: www.sciencetimes.com/

Jurassic World 3 Needs To Save The Dinosaurs (For John Hammond's Legacy)

Monday, January 11, 2021

The upcoming Jurassic World: Dominion needs to save the franchise’s dinosaurs to secure the legacy of original theme park creator John Hammond.

Jurassic World: Dominion needs to save the franchise’s dinosaurs to secure the legacy of original park creator John Hammond. Released in 2015, Jurassic World rebooted the Jurassic Park series in style by introducing a fully functioning dinosaur theme park that soon became as lethally disastrous as the original movie’s unopened test site. The 2018 sequel Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom saw the franchise try to work out how to handle the destroyed park’s surviving dinosaurs, and ended with the surreal sight of them rampaging through the human world.

To wrap up a lot of loose threads from both the Jurassic Park and Jurassic World franchises, the third movie in the series will see returning Jurassic World director Colin Trevorrow bring in characters from the original Jurassic Park trilogy such as Alan Grant and Ellie Sattler alongside Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard. These returning characters look set to finally finish the story of John Hammond’s ill-fated theme park, but to end things properly, there are a lot of elements Jurassic World: Dominion needs to get right. Namely, it needs to save the dinosaurs to do justice to John Hammond’s legacy.

Where the original Michael Crichton novel of the same name featured an amoral John Hammond who wanted to play God and didn’t care about the consequences, Jaws director Stephen Spielberg opted for a more empathetic approach to the character in his 1993 blockbuster Jurassic Park. In the movie’s version of events, Richard Attenborough’s iconic incarnation of Hammond may be a little showy and thoughtless, but he’s an ultimately well-meaning figure. A kindly grandfather, Hammond not only survives Jurassic Park (unlike the original novel), but he learns his lesson by the end of the movie, noting that the dinosaurs should be left to inhabit the islands of the Five Deaths archipelago without further human intervention. It's a lesson that has since been forgotten by the characters of the reboot series, but there's still time for Jurassic World: Dominion to salvage this legacy.

Jurassic World Failed John Hammond's Legacy

The events of Jurassic World make it clear that John Hammond’s legacy is long forgotten. Where the philanthropist accepted by the end of Jurassic Park that a dinosaur theme park is a bad idea and the creatures should be left to their own devices in the wild, by the time Jurassic World rolls around, the theme park operators are attempting to maintain an even bigger dinosaur theme park despite the risk this poses to guests. Not only this, but declining public interest in the spectacle of real-life dinosaurs means that the characters of the Jurassic World trilogy have even dabbled in some genetic experimentation to create the Indominus Rex, a modified predator that is more lethal than any pre-existing dinosaur.

Of course, this hubris comes with a heavy human price as the second act of Jurassic World sees the park descend into bloody chaos. Countless civilians and dinosaurs alike are killed or harmed in a gruesome bloodbath that could have been avoided entirely if the proprietors had heeded the session leaned by John Hammond in the original Jurassic Park. The Jurassic World series continued in this vein with 2018’s Fallen Kingdom, wherein a set of amoral mercenaries and Rafe Spall’s snide, over-ambitious assistant conspire to sell the park’s remaining dinosaurs as bio-weapons to international cabals of shady criminals. Once again, Hammond’s legacy-defining epiphany that the dinosaurs should be left alone and nature should be allowed to take its course was ignored (albeit by much cartoon-ier villains this time around).

Jurassic World Has Setup More Dinosaur-Human Conflict For Dominion

The third film in the franchise, Jurassic World: Dominion, is predicated on a killer hook provided by the ending of Fallen Kingdom. As the movie’s closing moments reveal, dinosaurs have been let loose out in the real world and now plague human cities, no longer confined in their island home. This premise suggests scenes of global conflict between humans and dinosaurs, a level of action never before seen in the series. With both the original Jurassic Park series and the Jurassic World movies set entirely in the Five Deaths archipelago until now (save for one T-Rex’s brief sojourn to the city in The Lost World), this means Jurassic World: Dominion will feature dinosaurs and humans facing off on the biggest scale yet. This idea will only move further away from what Hammond wanted, as his dream of a world where dinosaurs can co-exist with humans by remaining contained in their island home becomes impossible to hold onto now that they’ve escaped. Not only that, with InGen and Biosyn both in play, this situation can only get worse for Hammond’s legacy.

Since the original Jurassic Park, wherein Dennis Nedry set much of the plot in motion by stealing dinosaur DNA for InGen competitors BioSyn, the two companies have never shown any regard for human or dinosaur life. Despite Hammond’s involvement in InGen, Spall’s Fallen Kingdom villain and BD Wong’s amoral Jurassic World character prove that the company doesn’t care about saving dinosaurs or preserving their island home as much as it wants to profit off their existence. Meanwhile their competitors BioSyn have always been willing to use underhanded tricks to get ahead, so looking toward that billion-dollar corporation for moral leadership is another lost cause. With both parties in play by the time Jurassic World: Dominion begins, things aren’t looking good for the dinosaurs or Hammond’s legacy.

How Jurassic World 3 Can Save The Dinosaurs (& Hammond's Legacy)

With BioSyn and InGen both out to profit off dinosaurs and the Jurassic World series thus far doing nothing to protect them, how can the final film in the trilogy, Jurassic World: Dominion, save the noble beasts and secure Hammond’s legacy in the process? It won’t be easy now that dinosaurs are an existential threat to human populations, but by not killing them and instead fulfilling Hammond’s original desire to take them to Site B, and leave them in peace, the series can do justice to the lesson learned by Attenborough’s over-ambitious character way back in the ending of the original film.

Sure, a lot of dinosaurs are likely to die while facing off against the human cast, but by saving the surviving dinosaurs instead of killing them all off, the Jurassic World series can ensure a safe home for the dinosaurs that still exist by allowing them to live in Isla Sorna undisturbed. Since the second film in the series, Isla Sorna has occasionally acted as a safe haven for the dinosaurs, and since viewers already know that some of Jurassic World: Dominion’s scenes are set there, there’s no better way to wrap up both trilogies than by putting the lesson John Hammond learned into effect (even if it is a few decades and avoidable casualties late).

Source: https://screenrant.com/

Why Haven’t Crocodiles Evolved Much Since the Age of the Dinosaurs?

Monday, January 11, 2021

 The skeleton of the Deinosuchus. Daderot/Wikimedia Commons/Public Domain

Evolution is the process of life adapting to its environment. And if you’re already perfect, why change? Here’s a list of four animals who got it right the first time and haven’t evolved in millions of years.

Perhaps the most fearsome living reptile today, modern crocodiles look like they could hold their own in an arm wrestle against a velociraptor. Saltwater crocodiles are the largest of all living reptiles and the largest land-loving apex predator (that means that no one eats them).

Our current crocodiles became their own species 55 million years ago. To become a new species, or to speciate, a species has to evolve so much that it no longer resembles the species it evolved from.

The crocodiles of today look very similar to those that lived during the Jurassic period some 200 million years ago. Though lizards and birds have evolved and diversified into many thousands of species, crocodiles have only a few species – just 25.

Mystriosuchus (a phytosaur) from Water Reptiles of the Past and Present, 1914 United States

Our crocodiles evolved from an animal in the prehistoric period called a Phytosaur. They looked very much like today’s crocodiles except their nostrils were on the top of their heads, not on their snouts. They eventually evolved into something resembling our modern crocodiles around the Jurassic period: flat snouts, powerful jaws, and long bodies. But their big sizes didn’t evolve until the Cretaceous period about 100 million years ago.

Many scientists believe that one of the reasons crocodiles haven’t had to evolve much is because of their predator strategy (how they get food).  Crocodiles wait until an animal comes to the water for a drink, and then eat it. It’s kind of like delivery!

Photo by fvanrenterghem licensed CC BY-SA 2.0

Now, scientists at the University of Bristol explain how a particular pattern of evolution known as the ‘stop–start’ pattern and certain environmental changes could explain why crocodiles haven’t changed much.
In a paper published in the journal Communications Biology, the scientists explain that crocodiles have a very slow rate of evolution. The team used a machine-learning algorithm to estimate the rates of evolution.
Lead author Max Stockdale from the University of Bristol’s School of Geographical Sciences said in a release that it was fascinating to see how intricate a relationship exists between the Earth and the living things we share it with. He explains that the crocodiles landed upon a lifestyle that was versatile enough to adapt to the enormous environmental changes that have taken place since the dinosaurs were around. The team is also working to identify why some types of prehistoric crocodiles died out, while others didn’t.

Source: www.cbc.ca/

Every Jurassic Park Movie, Ranked By Rotten Tomatoes

Saturday, January 9, 2021

There are currently five films in the Jurassic Park franchise with one on the way. But not all of them were perfect, according to Rotten Tomatoes.

Steven Spielberg’s Jurassic Park was so groundbreaking in its use of computer-generated effects that it inspired George Lucas to make the Star Wars prequels, Peter Jackson to make The Lord of the Rings trilogy, and Stanley Kubrick to make A.I.: Artificial Intelligence (although he died during pre-production and Spielberg ended up directing it).

RELATED: Every Spielberg Movie, Ranked By Rotten Tomatoes

The movie has since been followed by two sequels, a reboot, and another sequel, with varying degrees of quality (the good, the bad, and the Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom). None of them have come close to matching the timeless classic status of the original, but some rank a lot higher than others on Rotten Tomatoes.

5 - Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom (47%)

Oh, boy. When The Orphanage director J.A. Bayona was poised to helm a darker, more horror-tinged Jurassic movie, fans unwisely got their hopes up. The first half of Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom randomly reveals that Isla Nublar has been an active volcano waiting to blow this entire time. The second half is a haunted house movie – Bayona’s bread and butter – in which the house is haunted with dinosaurs. This makes the movie feel like two story ideas got lazily stitched together without fully exploring either of them.

Neither half of the movie is good enough to make up for the other one. The audience is constantly expected to make huge leaps in logic, like Owen getting inches away from molten lava and surviving (following “the floor is made of lava” rules) or Maisie feeling a kindred spirit with the dinosaurs and unleashing them into the wilderness of North America.

Jeff Goldblum’s return to the role of Ian Malcolm was touted as a big deal in the trailers, but in the actual movie, it’s a glorified cameo. He says all his lines from the same chair – it probably didn’t even take a full day to shoot his entire role in the movie. Also, the trailers were filled with shots of dinosaurs terrorizing the mainland like it was a part of the movie, but it was actually a montage at the end, so it was basically a trailer for the next movie.

4 - Jurassic Park III (49%)

Widely regarded to be the worst a Jurassic Park movie could possibly be before Fallen Kingdom came along, Jurassic Park III begins with the notorious dream sequence in which a velociraptor says, “Alan,” and then it just gets worse from there. The story doesn’t even have a proper ending: the army just shows up to put the movie out of its misery.

The threequel has a couple of saving graces: the misty high-altitude set piece with the pterodactyls is pretty unnerving, and Billy Brennan is fun to hate. Sam Neill’s return to the role of Dr. Alan Grant has its moments, but the script completely underserves the character, retooling him as a kind of third-rate Indiana Jones.

3 - The Lost World: Jurassic Park (53%)

Universal wasn’t going to let Jurassic Park be a one-off after it became the highest grossing movie of all time. The Lost World: Jurassic Park is the only sequel that Steven Spielberg has ever directed outside the Indiana Jones series (although he wanted to make a sequel to Tintin, and still should), and it stands proudly beside Kingdom of the Crystal Skull as one of his worst movies.

The sequence with the bus hanging off the side of the cliff is pretty intense, but it has a couple of cartoonish moments and never achieves the heights of Hitchcockian suspense found in the T. rex’s escape or the velociraptors’ kitchen attack from the first movie. Where the original used dinosaurs sparingly, The Lost World flaunts them around willy-nilly – there’s a San Diego-set riff on Godzilla in the final act.

2 - Jurassic World (70%)

Colin Trevorrow’s Jurassic World is the closest that the Jurassic franchise has come to matching the magic of Spielberg’s 1993 original. It gets off to a great start, exploring a whole new premise in the operations of a functioning dinosaur park, but it starts to go off the rails when audiences are expected to believe that live dinosaurs got boring after a couple of years and they need to create a hybrid dinosaur to boost attendance.

RELATED: Lego Jurassic World: 5 Things It Got Right About The Movies (& 5 Things It Got Wrong)

Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard both bring their A-game, but their characters Owen Grady and Claire Dearing are so thinly written and generic that nobody refers to them as Owen and Claire; they call them “Chris Pratt” and “Bryce Dallas Howard.”

1 - Jurassic Park (91%)

It’s no surprise that the original Jurassic Park movie still ranks head and shoulders above its sequels on Rotten Tomatoes, because there probably shouldn’t have been any sequels in the first place. The story of John Hammond’s theme park and the cloning operation that made it possible was told in its entirety in the first movie.

After determining that playing God is wrong and a resort like Jurassic Park shouldn’t exist because the dinosaurs could escape and eat people, there’s nowhere else to go with this story and its themes. The sequels have all bungled their attempts to repackage the same message that was delivered perfectly in the first movie.

This movie was Star Wars for a new generation. In its initial theatrical run, it became the highest grossing movie of all time, following in the footsteps of its bestselling source material. No amount of bad, unnecessary sequels will be able to tarnish the legacy of the near-perfect original.

Source: https://gamerant.com/

Saber-Toothed Tigers Had Unique Growth Strategy among Big Cats

Saturday, January 9, 2021

An artist’s impression of Smilodon fatalis. Image credit: Sergio De la Rosa / CC BY-SA 3.0.

Paleontologists from the Royal Ontario Museum and the University of Toronto have found and examined the fossilized remains of two subadult and one adult saber-toothed tigers (Smilodon fatalis) — likely a mother and two adolescents — in the Pleistocene coastal deposits in Ecuador. Their results show that saber-toothed tigers had a unique growth strategy that combined a growth rate that is similar to a tiger and the extended growth period of a lion.

Smilodon is a genus of extinct felids that lived in the Americas during the Pleistocene epoch, between 2.5 million and 10,000 years ago.

Commonly known as saber-toothed tigers, it includes three recognized species: Smilodon fatalisS. gracilis, and S. populator.

“The saber-toothed cat Smilodon occurred throughout North America and South America during the Pleistocene,” said lead author Ashley Reynolds and colleagues.

“Of the three recognized species, Smilodon fatalis is the most completely known, with thousands of well-preserved specimens in collections from so-called ‘tar pits’.”

“Without the necessary evidence to determine associations between individuals of Smilodon fatalis due to reworking and time-averaging, inferences about social behavior are exceptionally difficult to infer from such ‘predator trap’ deposits. Thus, smaller fossil assemblages of associated individuals preserved in fluviodeltaic depositional environments may be more useful for inferring aspects of life history and social behavior in these carnivores.”

“We describe a multiple individual association of Smilodon fatalis preserved in a fluviodeltaic depositional setting in Ecuador,” they added.

“Our analysis suggests that this assemblage is best interpreted as a part of a family group derived from a catastrophic mass mortality event, and thereby provides unique insights into the life history of this iconic predator.”

Smilodon fatalis cubs. Image credit: Danielle Dufault, Royal Ontario Museum.

The fossilized partial jaws and skeletal elements from at least two subadult siblings and a single mature individual of Smilodon fatalis were found at the Coralito locality in Ecuador.

“Our study started out as a simple description of previously unpublished fossils,” Reynolds said.

“But when we noticed the two lower jaws we were working on shared a type of tooth only found in about 5% of the Smilodon fatalis population, we knew the work was about to become much more interesting.”

Reynolds and co-authors found that they were likely looking at three related individuals: one adult and two young adolescents.

They determined that the siblings were at least two years old, an age at which some living big cats, such as tigers, are already independent.

“The social lives of these iconic predators have been mysterious, in part because their concentration in tar seeps leaves so much room for interpretation,” said Dr. Kevin Seymour, co-author of the study.

“This historic assemblage of saber-cat fossils from Ecuador was formed in a different way, allowing us to determine the two juveniles likely lived, and died, together — and were therefore probably siblings.”

paper on the findings was published in the journal iScience.

_____

Ashley R. Reynolds et alSmilodon fatalis siblings reveal life history in a saber-toothed cat. iScience, published online January 7, 2021; doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101916

Source: www.sci-news.com/

Pages